4.4 Article

BiP Availability Distinguishes States of Homeostasis and Stress in the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Living Cells

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 1909-1921

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1066

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R21 1R21AG032544-01]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [R01GM086530-01, F31GM089090]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32 GM007491, T32GM07288]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accumulation of misfolded secretory proteins causes cellular stress and induces the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway, the unfolded protein response (UPR). Although the UPR has been extensively studied, little is known about the molecular changes that distinguish the homeostatic and stressed ER. The increase in levels of misfolded proteins and formation of complexes with chaperones during ER stress are predicted to further crowd the already crowded ER lumen. Surprisingly, using live cell fluorescence microscopy and an inert ER reporter, we find the crowdedness of stressed ER, treated acutely with tunicamycin or DTT, either is comparable to homeostasis or significantly decreases in multiple cell types. In contrast, photobleaching experiments revealed a GFP-tagged variant of the ER chaperone BiP rapidly undergoes a reversible quantitative decrease in diffusion as misfolded proteins accumulate. BiP mobility is sensitive to exceptionally low levels of misfolded protein stressors and can detect intermediate states of BiP availability. Decreased BiP availability temporally correlates with UPR markers, but restoration of BiP availability correlates less well. Thus, BiP availability represents a novel and powerful tool for reporting global secretory protein misfolding levels and investigating the molecular events of ER stress in single cells, independent of traditional UPR markers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available