4.4 Article

Gp78 cooperates with RMA1 in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of CFTRΔF508

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 1328-1336

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E07-06-0601

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19058008, 19GS0314] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Misfolded or improperly assembled proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are exported into the cytosol and degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, a process termed ER-associated degradation (ERAD). Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hrd1p/Der3p is an ER membrane-spanning ubiquitin ligase that participates in ERAD of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) when CFTR is exogenously expressed in yeast cells. Two mammalian orthologues of yeast Hrd1p/Der3p, gp78 and HRD1, have been reported. Here, we demonstrate that gp78, but not HRD1, participates in ERAD of the CFTR mutant CFTR Delta F508, by specifically promoting ubiquitylation of CFTR Delta F508. Domain swapping experiments and deletion analysis revealed that gp78 binds to CFTR Delta F508 through its ubiquitin binding region, the so-called coupling of ubiquitin to ER degradation (CUE) domain. Gp78 polyubiquitylated in vitro an N-terminal ubiquitin-glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-fusion protein, but not GST alone. This suggests that gp78 recognizes the ubiquitin that is already conjugated to CFTR Delta F508 and catalyzes further polyubiquitylation of CFTR Delta F508 in a manner similar to that of a multiubiquitin chain assembly factor (E4). Furthermore, we revealed by small interfering RNA methods that the ubiquitin ligase RMA1 functioned as an E3 enzyme upstream of gp78. Our data demonstrates that gp78 cooperates with RMA1 with E4-like activity in the ERAD of CFTR Delta F508.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available