4.8 Article

Killer Whale Nuclear Genome and mtDNA Reveal Widespread Population Bottleneck during the Last Glacial Maximum

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 1121-1131

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu058

Keywords

genomics; demographics; Cetacea; population bottleneck

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council UK [NE/014443/1]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of health [U54 HG003273]
  3. Danish Basic Research Foundation [DNF94]
  4. NERC [NE/J014443/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J014443/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecosystem function and resilience is determined by the interactions and independent contributions of individual species. Apex predators play a disproportionately determinant role through their influence and dependence on the dynamics of prey species. Their demographic fluctuations are thus likely to reflect changes in their respective ecological communities and habitat. Here, we investigate the historical population dynamics of the killer whale based on draft nuclear genome data for the Northern Hemisphere and mtDNA data worldwide. We infer a relatively stable population size throughout most of the Pleistocene, followed by an order of magnitude decline and bottleneck during the Weichselian glacial period. Global mtDNA data indicate that while most populations declined, at least one population retained diversity in a stable, productive ecosystem off southern Africa. We conclude that environmental changes during the last glacial period promoted the decline of a top ocean predator, that these events contributed to the pattern of diversity among extant populations, and that the relatively high diversity of a population currently in productive, stable habitat off South Africa suggests a role for ocean productivity in the widespread decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available