4.8 Article

Dual-Targeted Proteins Tend to be More Evolutionarily Conserved

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 2770-2779

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu221

Keywords

protein conservation; dual targeting; mitochondrial import

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
  2. Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF)
  3. USA-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF)
  4. CREATE project of the National Research Foundation of Singapore
  5. Ori Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In eukaryotic cells, identical proteins can be located in more than a single subcellular compartment, a phenomenon termed dual targeting. We hypothesized that dual-targeted proteins should be more evolutionary conserved than exclusive mitochondrial proteins, due to separate selective pressures administered by the different compartments to maintain the functions associated with the protein sequences. We employed codon usage bias, propensity for gene loss, phylogenetic relationships, conservation analysis at the DNA level, and gene expression, to test our hypothesis. Our findings indicate that, indeed, dual-targeted proteins are significantly more conserved than their exclusively targeted counterparts. We then used this trait of gene conservation, together with previously identified traits of dual-targeted proteins (such as protein net charge and mitochondrial targeting sequence strength) to 1) create, for the first time (due to addition of conservation parameters), a tool for the prediction of dual-targeted mitochondrial proteins based on protein and mRNA sequences, and 2) show that molecular mechanisms involving one versus two translation products are not correlated with specific dual-targeting parameters. Finally, we discuss what evolutionary pressure maintains protein dual targeting in eukaryotes and deduce, as we initially hypothesized, that it is the discrete functions of these proteins in the different subcellular compartments, regardless of their dual-targeting mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available