4.8 Article

Lowly Expressed Genes in Arabidopsis thaliana Bear the Signature of Possible Pseudogenization by Promoter Degradation

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 1193-1203

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq298

Keywords

pseudogene; promoter; evolutionary rates

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. NSF [DEB-0723860]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0723860] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0920611] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudogenes are defined as nonfunctional DNA sequences with homology to functional protein-coding genes, and they typically contain nonfunctional mutations within the presumptive coding region. In theory, pseudogenes can also be caused by mutations in upstream regulatory regions, appearing as open reading frames with attenuated expression. In this study, we identified 1,939 annotated protein-coding genes with little evidence of expression in Arabidopsis thaliana and characterized their molecular evolutionary characteristics. On average, this set of genes was shorter than expressed genes and evolved with a 2-fold higher rate of nonsynonymous substitutions. The divergence of upstream sequences, based on ortholog comparisons to A. lyrata, was also higher than expressed genes, suggesting that these lowly expressed genes could be examples of pseudogenization by promoter disablement, often due to transposable element insertion. We complemented our empirical study by extending the models of Force et al. (Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545.) to derive the probability of promoter disablements after gene duplication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available