Journal
SCIENCE
Volume 347, Issue 6219, Pages 262-265Publisher
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1261375
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NSF [BCS-1226942]
- Spencer Foundation [201100111]
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
- Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1226942] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The gender imbalance in STEM subjects dominates current debates about women's underrepresentation in academia. However, women are well represented at the Ph.D. level in some sciences and poorly represented in some humanities (e.g., in 2011, 54% of U.S. Ph.D.'s in molecular biology were women versus only 31% in philosophy). We hypothesize that, across the academic spectrum, women are underrepresented in fields whose practitioners believe that raw, innate talent is the main requirement for success, because women are stereotyped as not possessing such talent. This hypothesis extends to African Americans' underrepresentation as well, as this group is subject to similar stereotypes. Results from a nationwide survey of academics support our hypothesis (termed the field-specific ability beliefs hypothesis) over three competing hypotheses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available