4.8 Article

Rapid rates of lineage-specific gene duplication and deletion in the α-globin gene family

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 591-602

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn004

Keywords

birth-and-death evolution; concerted evolution; gene duplication; gene family; alpha-globin; hemoglobin

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL087216] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phylogeny reconstructions of the globin gene families have revealed that paralogous genes within species are often more similar to one another than they are to their orthologous counterparts in closely related species. This pattern has been previously attributed to mechanisms of concerted evolution such as interparalog gene conversion that homogenize sequence variation between tandemly duplicated genes and therefore create the appearance of recent common ancestry. Here we report a comparative genomic analysis of the alpha-globin gene family in mammals that reveal a surprisingly high rate of lineage-specific gene duplication and deletion via unequal crossing-over. Results of our analysis reveal that patterns of sequence similarity between paralogous alpha-like globin genes from the same species are only partly explained by concerted evolution between preexisting gene duplicates. In a number of cases, sequence similarity between paralogous sequences from the same species is attributable to recent ancestry between the products of de novo gene duplications. As a result of this surprisingly rapid rate of gene gain and loss, many mammals possess alpha-like globin genes that have no orthologous counterparts in closely related species. The resultant variation in gene copy number among species may represent an important source of regulatory variation that affects physiologically important aspects of blood oxygen transport and aerobic energy metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available