4.8 Review

Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO2 emissions scenarios

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 349, Issue 6243, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4722

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation
  2. Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre of the International Atomic Energy Agency
  3. BNP Paribas Foundation
  4. Monegasque Association for Ocean Acidification
  5. French National Research Agency (CapAdapt project) [ANR-2011-JSH1-004 01]
  6. RESCCUE project - French Development Agency
  7. French Global Environment Facility [AFD CZZ 1647 01 F, FFEM CZZ 1667 01 H]
  8. Nippon Foundation-UBC Nereus Program
  9. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  10. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
  11. UK Ocean Acidification research program
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation
  13. Commission through the European Union Framework Programme 7 project CARBOCHANGE [264879]
  14. University of Queensland
  15. Australian Research Council Centre for Excellence
  16. ARC Laureate Fellowship
  17. PACES program
  18. BIOACID program
  19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  20. NASA
  21. government of the Principality of Monaco
  22. NERC [pml010005, pml010009] Funding Source: UKRI
  23. Natural Environment Research Council [pml010009, pml010005] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ocean moderates anthropogenic climate change at the cost of profound alterations of its physics, chemistry, ecology, and services. Here, we evaluate and compare the risks of impacts on marine and coastal ecosystems-and the goods and services they provide-for growing cumulative carbon emissions under two contrasting emissions scenarios. The current emissions trajectory would rapidly and significantly alter many ecosystems and the associated services on which humans heavily depend. A reduced emissions scenario-consistent with the Copenhagen Accord's goal of a global temperature increase of less than 2 degrees C-is much more favorable to the ocean but still substantially alters important marine ecosystems and associated goods and services. The management options to address ocean impacts narrow as the ocean warms and acidifies. Consequently, any new climate regime that fails to minimize ocean impacts would be incomplete and inadequate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available