4.5 Article

Modulation of imprinted gene expression following superovulation

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 388, Issue 1-2, Pages 51-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.03.003

Keywords

Superovulation; Mouse; Igf2; Placenta; Imprinting; H19

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Canada [110987]
  2. Healthy Gametes and Great Embryos Strategic Initiative of the CIHR Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health
  3. CIHR Graduate Studentship
  4. Fonds de la recherche du Quebec-sante

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although assisted reproductive technologies increase the risk of low birth weight and genomic imprinting disorders, the precise underlying causes remain unclear. Using a mouse model, we previously showed that superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the placenta at 9.5 days (E9.5) of gestation. Here, we investigate whether effects of superovulation on genomic imprinting persisted at later stages of development and assess the surviving fetuses for growth and morphological abnormalities. Superovulation, followed by embryo transfer at E3.5, as compared to spontaneous ovulation (controls), resulted in embryos of normal size and weight at 14.5 and 18.5 days of gestation. The normal monoallelic expression of the imprinted genes H19, Snrpn and Kcnq1 ot1 was unaffected in either the placentae or the embryos from the superovulated females at E14.5 or E18.5. However, for the paternally expressed imprinted gene Igf2, superovulation generated placentae with reduced production of the mature protein at E9.5 and significantly more variable mRNA levels at E14.5. We propose that superovulation results in the ovulation of abnormal oocytes with altered expression of imprinted genes, but that the coregulated genes of the imprinted gene network result in modulated expression. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available