4.5 Article

Kinase Regulation by Hydrophobic Spine Assembly in Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 264-276

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00943-14

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. NIH [AI57966, DK96688, GM19301]
  3. NSF [DGE1144086]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R37AI057966] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R37GM019301, R01GM019301] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new model of kinase regulation based on the assembly of hydrophobic spines has been proposed. Changes in their positions can explain the mechanism of kinase activation. Here, we examined mutations in human cancer for clues about the regulation of the hydrophobic spines by focusing initially on mutations to Phe. We identified a selected number of Phe mutations in a small group of kinases that included BRAF, ABL1, and the epidermal growth factor receptor. Testing some of these mutations in BRAF, we found that one of the mutations impaired ATP binding and catalytic activity but promoted noncatalytic allosteric functions. Other Phe mutations functioned to promote constitutive catalytic activity. One of these mutations revealed a previously underappreciated hydrophobic surface that functions to position the dynamic regulatory alpha C-helix. This supports the key role of the C-helix as a signal integration motif for coordinating multiple elements of the kinase to create an active conformation. The importance of the hydrophobic space around the alpha C-helix was further tested by studying a V600F mutant, which was constitutively active in the absence of the negative charge that is associated with the common V600E mutation. Many hydrophobic mutations strategically localized along the C-helix can thus drive kinase activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available