4.5 Article

Intra- and Intermolecular Regulatory Interactions in Upf1, the RNA Helicase Central to Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Yeast

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 23, Pages 4672-4684

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01136-13

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R37GM27757]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA helicases are involved in almost every aspect of RNA metabolism, yet very little is known about the regulation of this class of enzymes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the stability and translational fidelity of nonsense-containing mRNAs are controlled by the group I RNA helicase Upf1 and the proteins it interacts with, Upf2 and Upf3. Combining the yeast two-hybrid system with genetic analysis, we show here that the cysteine-and histidine-rich (CH) domain and the RNA helicase domain of yeast Upf1 can engage in two new types of molecular interactions: an intramolecular interaction between these two domains and self-association of each of these domains. Multiple observations indicate that these molecular interactions are crucial for Upf1 regulation. First, coexpression of the CH domain and the RNA helicase domain in trans can reconstitute Upf1 function in both promoting nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) and preventing nonsense suppression. Second, mutations that disrupt Upf1 intramolecular interaction cause loss of Upf1 function. These mutations weaken Upf2 interaction and, surprisingly, promote Upf1 self-association. Third, the genetic defects resulting from deficiency in Upf1 intramolecular interaction or RNA binding are suppressed by expression of Upf2. Collectively, these data reveal a set of sequential molecular interactions and their roles in regulating Upf1 function during activation of NMD and suggest that cis intramolecular interaction and trans self-association may be general mechanisms for regulation of RNA helicase functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available