4.5 Article

The Drosophila Ortholog of MLL3 and MLL4, trithorax related, Functions as a Negative Regulator of Tissue Growth

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 9, Pages 1702-1710

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01585-12

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM61672]
  2. American Cancer Society [120366-RP-11-078-01-DDC]
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and technology
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  5. Keio Gijuku Academic Development Funds
  6. MEXT
  7. Keio University
  8. TRiP at Harvard Medical School (NIH/NIGMS) [R01-GM084947]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human MLL genes (MLL1 to MLL4) and their Drosophila orthologs, trithorax (trx) and trithorax related (trr), encode proteins capable of methylating histone H3 on lysine 4. MLL1 and MLL2 are most similar to trx, while MLL3 and MLL4 are more closely related to trr. Several MLL genes are mutated in human cancers, but how these proteins regulate cell proliferation is not known. Here we show that trr mutant cells have a growth advantage over their wild-type neighbors and display changes in the levels of multiple proteins that regulate growth and cell division, including Notch, Capicua, and cyclin B. trr mutant clones display markedly reduced levels of H3K4 monomethylation without obvious changes in the levels of H3K4 di- and trimethylation. The trr mutant phenotype resembles that of Utx, which encodes a H3K27 demethylase, consistent with the observation that Trr and Utx are found in the same protein complex. In contrast to the overgrowth displayed by trr mutant tissue, trx clones are un-derrepresented, express low levels of the antiapoptotic protein Diap1, and exhibit only modest changes in global levels of H3K4 methylation. Thus, in Drosophila eye imaginal discs, Trr, likely functioning together with Utx, restricts tissue growth. In contrast, Trx appears to promote cell survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available