4.5 Article

Survival and Differentiation of Mammary Epithelial Cells in Mammary Gland Development Require Nuclear Retention of Id2 Due to RANK Signaling

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 23, Pages 4775-4788

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.05646-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [0920310]
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation from the Korean government (MOST) [2009-0084056]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2009-0079371]
  4. Korean Government (MEST) [NRF-M1AXA002-2010-0029780]
  5. Korea Health Promotion Institute [0920310] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0079371] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RANKL plays an essential role in mammary gland development during pregnancy. However, the molecular mechanism by which RANK signaling leads to mammary gland development is largely unknown. We report here that RANKL stimulation induces phosphorylation of Id2 at serine 5, which leads to nuclear retention of Id2. In lactating Id2Tg; RANKL(-/-) mice, Id2 was not phosphorylated and was localized in the cytoplasm. In addition, in lactating Id2(S5A)Tg mice, Id2(S5A) (with serine 5 mutated to alanine) was exclusively localized in the cytoplasm of mammary epithelial cells (MECs), while endogenous Id2 was localized in the nucleus. Intriguingly, nuclear expression of Id2(S5A) rescued increased apoptosis and defective differentiation of MECs in RANKL(-/-) mice. Our results demonstrate that nuclear retention of Id2 due to RANK signaling plays a decisive role in the survival and differentiation of MECs during mammary gland development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available