4.6 Article

Radioresistant Sf9 insect cells display moderate resistance against cumene hydroperoxide

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 367, Issue 1-2, Pages 141-151

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-012-1327-6

Keywords

Cumene hydroperoxide; Sf9 cells; Radioresistance; Cell death; Membrane damage; Stress resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Defence, Government of India
  2. JSK from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India
  3. DRDO [INM-311.1.5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lepidopteran insect cells serve as excellent model to study stress responses and are known to display resistance against DNA damaging agents including ionizing radiation; however, limited information is available on the effects of membrane damaging agents in these cells. In this study, we investigated the response of Sf9 cells (derived from ovaries of Spodoptera frugiperda; order Lepidoptera) to cumene hydroperoxide (CHPx), compared to human BMG-1 cells. CHPx treatment at doses lethal for human cells also caused typical necrosis in Sf9. Severe necrosis in human BMG-1 cells was observed at 125 mu M, whereas similar effect in Sf9 cells was observed at 250 mu M. In Sf9 cells, CHPx (250 mu M) induced negligible changes in mitochondrial membrane potential and intracellular reactive oxygen species, while moderate effect was observed on intracellular calcium distribution. Reduced DNA damage and lipid (including cardiolipin) oxidation was observed in Sf9 cells that could be due to moderate total antioxidant status and constitutive/induced glutathione S-transferase activity. This study importantly demonstrates that Lepidopteran insect cells having extensive resistance towards DNA damaging agents show only moderately higher resistance to membrane damaging agents. A stronger reducing environment involving efficient antioxidant system seems to contribute significantly in this response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available