4.6 Article

Lung cancer risk in north Indian population: role of genetic polymorphisms and smoking

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 322, Issue 1-2, Pages 73-79

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-008-9941-z

Keywords

Lung cancer; Smoking; Genetic polymorphism; GSTM1; CYP1A1

Categories

Funding

  1. ICMR (Delhi)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in developing as well as developed countries. Life style choices, particularly tobacco smoking, have been implicated as the main cause in the development of the LC. Despite the fact that majority cases of the LC occur among smokers, only 1-15% of smokers develop LC. In the present study, we have explored the role of genetic polymorphism, smoking habit and their association to LC in a cohort of north Indian population. The polymorphic genes explored were CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 using techniques of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Real Time PCR (RT PCR), and gene sequencing. Genetic polymorphism was analysed in 253 normal participants (control) and 93 LC patients originating from Lucknow, India. Data were compared using odds ratio and Fisher Exact Test. We found that smoking increases the susceptibility to LC threefold (OR = 2.9; 95% CI: 0.9-2.8). The most significant risk for LC (OR = 3.2; 95% CI: 0.7-3.8) was found in the association of the homozygous variant of CYP1A1 gene at A2455G base change at Exon 7 (Val/Val) genotype. There was a marginally significant association between LC and GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.7) while no significant risk association was found between GSTP1 polymorphism and LC. The present study demonstrates that the presence of null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 taken together with CYP1A1 (Val/Val) genotype increases the susceptibility to LC eightfold in comparison to CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile) and GSTM1/GSTT1 genotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available