4.1 Article

External pH influences the transcriptional profile of the carbonic anhydrase, CAH-4b in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 2, Pages 140-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.06.013

Keywords

C. elegans; environmental pH; carbonic anhydrase; global transcriptional analysis

Funding

  1. The Wellcome Trust
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. European Union
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. MRC [G0601049] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0601049] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insight into how organisms adapt to environmental stimuli has become increasingly important in recent years for identifying key virulence factors in many species. The life cycle of many pathogenic nematode species forces the organism to experience environments which would otherwise be considered stressful. One of the conditions often encountered by nematodes is a change in environmental pH. Living in a soil environment Caenorhabditis elegans will naturally encounter fluctuations in external pH. Therefore, C elegans has the potential to provide an insight into how pathogenic nematodes survive and proliferate in these environments. We found that C elegans can maintain over 90% survival in pH conditions ranging from pH 3 to 10. This was unrelated to the non-specific protection provided by the cuticle. Global transcriptional analysis identified many genes, which were differentially regulated by pH. The gene cah-4 encodes two putative alpha carbonic anhydrases (CAH-4a and CAH-4b), one of which was five-fold up regulated in an alkaline environment (CAH-4b). Stopped-flow analysis of CAH-4b using 35 different carbonic anhydrase inhibitors identified complex benzenesulfonamide compounds as the most potent inhibitors (K-i 35-89 nM). (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available