4.7 Article

JUMP: A Tag-based Database Search Tool for Peptide Identification with High Sensitivity and Accuracy

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 3663-3673

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O114.039586

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG039764, NS08157]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-09-181]
  3. ALSAC (American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities)
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA021765] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R21AG039764] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Database search programs are essential tools for identifying peptides via mass spectrometry (MS) in shotgun proteomics. Simultaneously achieving high sensitivity and high specificity during a database search is crucial for improving proteome coverage. Here we present JUMP, a new hybrid database search program that generates amino acid tags and ranks peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) by an integrated score from the tags and pattern matching. In a typical run of liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem MS, more than 95% of MS/MS spectra can generate at least one tag, whereas the remaining spectra are usually too poor to derive genuine PSMs. To enhance search sensitivity, the JUMP program enables the use of tags as short as one amino acid. Using a target-decoy strategy, we compared JUMP with other programs (e.g. SEQUEST, Mascot, PEAKS DB, and InsPecT) in the analysis of multiple datasets and found that JUMP outperformed these preexisting programs. JUMP also permitted the analysis of multiple co-fragmented peptides from mixture spectra to further increase PSMs. In addition, JUMP-derived tags allowed partial de novo sequencing and facilitated the unambiguous assignment of modified residues. In summary, JUMP is an effective database search algorithm complementary to current search programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available