4.7 Article

Quantitative Tracking of Isotope Flows in Proteomes of Microbial Communities

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M110.006049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-SC0004665]
  2. Systems Biology Knowledgebase [DE-SC0004918]
  3. Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research
  4. Department of Energy [DOE-AC05-00OR22725]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0004665] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotope probing (SIP) has been used to track nutrient flows in microbial communities, but existing protein-based SIP methods capable of quantifying the degree of label incorporation into peptides and proteins have been demonstrated only by targeting usually less than 100 proteins per sample. Our method automatically (i) identifies the sequence of and (ii) quantifies the degree of heavy atom enrichment for thousands of proteins from microbial community proteome samples. These features make our method suitable for comparing isotopic differences between closely related protein sequences, and for detecting labeling patterns in low-abundance proteins or proteins derived from rare community members. The proteomic SIP method was validated using proteome samples of known stable isotope incorporation levels at 0.4%, similar to 50%, and similar to 98%. The method was then used to monitor incorporation of (15)N into established and regrowing microbial biofilms. The results indicate organism-specific migration patterns from established communities into regrowing communities and provide insights into metabolism during biofilm formation. The proteomic SIP method can be extended to many systems to track fluxes of (13)C or (15)N in microbial communities. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10: 10.1074/mcp.M110.006049, 1-11, 2011.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available