4.2 Article

Total lesion glycolysis as an IgG4-related disease activity marker

Journal

MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 579-584

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14397595.2014.990674

Keywords

FDG-PET; IgG4-related disease; Soluble IL-2 receptor; Total lesion glycolysis

Categories

Funding

  1. respiratory failure research group of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  2. IgG4-related disease research group of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) was reported to be useful for monitoring immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD); however, a quantitative FDG-PET/CT analysis such as total lesion glycolysis (TLG) has not yet been conducted. This study aimed to investigate whether TLG would correlate with serum markers in IgG4-RD, and the utility of TLG for disease monitoring. Methods. This retrospective study included 17 patients (12 men; median age, 62 years) who were followed up at Kyoto University Hospital and underwent FDG-PET/CT from April 2009 to November 2013. TLG was calculated for the involved lesions. Correlations between serum markers [IgG4, soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and TLG concomitant with FDG-PET/CT scans were investigated. Serial changes in TLG were assessed in patients who underwent follow-up FDG-PET/CT (n = 6). Results. The calculated median (IQL) TLG value was 154.8 (63.7-324.4). A significant correlation was found between the sIL-2R level and TLG (P = 0.001, rs = 0.763). In contrast, no correlations were found between the IgG4, LDH, or CRP levels and TLG. Increased or decreased TLG corresponded with clinical disease improvement or worsening. Conclusions. TLG correlated significantly with the serum sIL-2R level and may be useful for disease monitoring in IgG4-RD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available