4.6 Article

NFκB expression is a feature of both activated B-cell-like and germinal center B-cell-like subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Journal

MODERN PATHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 1331-1337

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.34

Keywords

activated B-cell-like; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; germinal center B-cell-like; NF kappa B

Categories

Funding

  1. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer (RTICC) [RD06/0020/0107, RD012/0036/0060]
  2. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (AECC)
  3. MINECO [SAF2008-03871]
  4. FIS [FIS-PI10/00621]
  5. Miguel Servet-contract [FIS-CP11/00018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) transcription factor family is considered to have a key role in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) pathogenesis and is associated with a specific molecular subtype, the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype. We evaluated the expression of NF kappa B by immunohistochemistry in a large series of DLBCL cases. The five different NF kappa B family members (NF kappa B1, NF kappa B2, RELA, RELB, and REL) showed a heterogeneous expression pattern with the vast majority of cases being positive for at least one factor. Two independent series of tumor samples were classified into germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) or ABC subtypes using different approaches, immunohistochemistry, or gene expression profiling, and the expression of NF kappa B family members was assessed. Notably, no significant differences regarding the expression of the different NF kappa B members were detected between the two subtypes, suggesting that NF kappa B signaling is a prominent feature not only in the ABC subtype, but also in the GCB tumors. Of the five transcription factors, only REL expression had a significant clinical impact on R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, identifying a subgroup of patients with superior clinical outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available