4.6 Article

TERT promoter mutations are frequent in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas

Journal

MODERN PATHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 502-508

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.168

Keywords

atypical fibroxanthoma; cancer genetics; dermatology; pleomorphic dermal sarcoma; telomerase; TERT; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

Categories

Funding

  1. Mercur-Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activating mutations in the TERT promoter leading to increased telomerase expression were recently identified in cutaneous melanoma and subsequently in many other types of cancer. These mutations lead to increased telomerase expression, allowing cells to proliferate continuously without entering apoptosis or senescence. Atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas are genetically poorly understood tumors developing in the skin of older patients. Known genetic events in these tumors are mutations in TP53 (atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma) and HAS (pleomorphic dermal sarcoma) genes, often having a UV signature. We analyzed a cohort of 27 atypical fibroxanthomas and 34 pleomorphic dermal sarcomas for the presence of TERT promoter mutations by conventional Sanger sequencing. TERT promoter mutations were identified in 25 (93%) atypical fibroxanthomas and in 26 (76%) pleomorphic dermal sarcomas. Mutations were found to have a UV signature (C>T or CC>TT) and were largely identical to those detected in cutaneous melanoma. Our data show that TEAT promoter mutations are the most frequent mutations in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas reported to date. The identified mutations confirm the pathogenetic role of UV exposure in both atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas and suggest that telomere maintenance through increased expression of telomerase plays an important role in the pathogenesis of these tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available