4.5 Article

Quality assessment of human mitochondrial DNA quantification: MITONAUTS, an international multicentre survey

Journal

MITOCHONDRION
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 520-527

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2011.01.011

Keywords

Inter-laboratory variability; mtDNA content by qPCR

Funding

  1. MSFHR [CI-SCH-50(02-1)]
  2. CIHR [YSH-80511]
  3. CFI [10427]
  4. United States of America Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health [RO1 AI074554, P20 MD000173]
  5. Istituto Superiore di Sanita. [30G.62]
  6. Fondo de Investigation Sanitaria [PI07/0347, PI08/90355, PS09/01602, PI08/0229]
  7. CIBERER (ISCIII)
  8. Fundacion para la Investigacion y la Prevencion del SIDA en Espana [FIPSE 09/360745]
  9. ISCIII (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondrial DNA quantification by qPCR is used in the context of many diseases and toxicity studies but comparison of results between laboratories is challenging. Through two multigroup distributions of DNA samples from human cell lines, the MITONAUTS group anonymously compared mtDNA/nDNA quantification across nine laboratories involved in HIV research worldwide. Eight of the nine sites showed significant correlation between them (mean raw data R-2=0.664; logio-transformed data R-2=0.844). Although mtDNA/nDNA values were well correlated between sites, the inter-site variability on the absolute measurements remained high with a mean (range) coefficient of variation of 71 (37-212) %. Some variability appeared cell line-specific, probably due to chromosomal alterations or pseudogenes affecting the quantification of certain genes, while within cell line variability was likely due to differences in calibration of the standard curves. The use of two mtDNA and two single copy nDNA genes with highly specific primers to quantify each genome would help address copy number variants. Our results indicate that sample shipment must be done frozen and that absolute mtDNA/nDNA ratio values cannot readily be compared between laboratories, especially if assessing cultured cell mtDNA content. However, within laboratory and relative mtDNA/nDNA comparisons between laboratories should be reliable. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available