4.5 Article

Muscle mitochondrial capacity exceeds maximal oxygen delivery in humans

Journal

MITOCHONDRION
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 303-307

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2010.12.006

Keywords

Mitochondria; Oxygen uptake; Exercise; Oxygen delivery; Humans

Funding

  1. John and Birthe Meyer Foundation
  2. Danish National Research Foundation [504-14]
  3. Fonds de le Recherche en Sante Quebec (FRSQ)
  4. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Across a wide range of species and body mass a close matching exists between maximal conductive oxygen delivery and mitochondrial respiratory rate. In this study we investigated in humans how closely in-vivo maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is matched to state 3 muscle mitochondrial respiration. High resolution respirometry was used to quantify mitochondrial respiration from the biopsies of arm and leg muscles while in-vivo arm and leg VO2 were determined by the Fick method during leg cycling and arm cranking. We hypothesized that muscle mitochondrial respiratory rate exceeds that of systemic oxygen delivery. The state 3 mitochondrial respiration of the deltoid muscle (4.3 +/- 0.4 mmol O-2 kg(-1) min(-1)) was similar to the in-vivo VO2 during maximal arm cranking (4.7 +/- 0.5 mmol O-2 kg(-1) min(-1)) with 6 kg muscle. In contrast, the mitochondrial state 3 of the quadriceps was 6.9 +/- 0.5 mmol O-2 kg(-1) min(-1), exceeding the in-vivo leg VO2 max (5.0 +/- 0.2 mmol O-2 kg(-1) min(-1)) during leg cycling with 20 kg muscle (P<0.05). Thus, when half or more of the body muscle mass is engaged during exercise, muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity surpasses in-vivo VO2 max. The findings reveal an excess capacity of muscle mitochondrial respiratory rate over O-2 delivery by the circulation in the cascade defining maximal oxidative rate in humans. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available