4.7 Article

Effects of dietary taurine supplementation on growth, feed efficiency, and nutrient composition of juvenile sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) fed plant based feeds

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 445, Issue -, Pages 79-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.03.030

Keywords

Taurine; Sablefish; Alternative feeds; 5 parameter saturated kinetics model

Funding

  1. US-Korea Joint Panel for Aquaculture [15-AQ-48]
  2. Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology [15-148]
  3. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science [5015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Juvenile sablefish were fed a low taurine, basal feed with seven graded levels of supplemental taurine to determine taurine requirements for growth and feed efficiency. The basal feed was plant based, formulated primarily with soy and corn proteins with a minimal (9%) amount of fishmeal. The unsupplemented, basal feed contained 0.14% taurine. Experimental feeds were supplemented with 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0% taurine. Using the five parameter, saturated kinetic model (5 SKM), peak weight gain was predicted at 1.5% dietary taurine. Optimum weight gain, as defined as the region of the 5 SKM curve corresponding to at least 95% of peak, was predicted between 0.4% and 5.8% dietary taurine. Peak feed efficiency was predicted at 1.1% dietary taurine with optimum weight gain predicted between 0.4% and 4.2%. Whole body and muscle tissue protein and lipid content were not affected by taurine supplementation. Tissue taurine content increased asymptotically with increasing dietary taurine supplementation. Whole body tissue became saturated at 0.25 +/- 0.02% taurine, expressed on a wet weight basis. Muscle tissue became saturated at 0.34 +/- 0.02% taurine. Results fromthis study should increase the performance of alternative, plant based feeds formulated for sablefish and enable regulatory agencies better estimate the potential human exposure to taurine fromthe consumption of sablefish receiving these feeds. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available