4.5 Article

Mitochondrial copy number and risk of breast cancer: A pilot study

Journal

MITOCHONDRION
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 62-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2009.09.004

Keywords

Mitochondrial DNA; Copy number; Oxidative stress; Breast cancer

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R25 CA114101] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R25CA114101] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been proposed that the copy number of mitochondria DNA (mtDNA) per cell reflects gene-environment interactions between unknown hereditary factors and exposures affecting levels of oxidative stress. However, whether copy number of mtDNA could be a risk predictor of oxidative stress-related human cancers, such as breast cancer, remains to be determined. To explore the role of mtDNA copy number in breast cancer etiology, we analyzed mtDNA copy number in whole blood from 103 patients with breast cancer and 103 matched control subjects and examined in relation to endogenous antioxidants. Case patients with breast cancer had a statistically significantly higher mtDNA copy number than control subjects (median: 1.29 vs. 0.80, P < 0.01). High mtDNA copy number (above the median in controls) was associated with a statistically significantly increased risk of breast cancer, compared with low copy number (Odds ratio (OR) = 4.67, 95% CI: 2.45-8.92), with a statistically significant dose-response relationship in trend analysis (P < 0.01). Moreover, mtDNA copy number was significantly inversely associated with several important endogenous oxidants and antioxidants in blood in either the cases (total glutathione, CuZn-SOD activity and myeloperoxidase (MPO)) or the controls (catalase (CAT) activity). These results suggest the mtDNA copy number could be associated with risk of breast cancer, perhaps through an oxidative stress mechanism. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available