4.0 Article

Divergence at Cyt-b and Co-1 mtDNA genes on different taxonomic levels and genetics of speciation in animals

Journal

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 55-65

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2011.588215

Keywords

Nucleotide diversity; p-distance; speciation genetics; mitochondrial DNA; molecular evolution

Funding

  1. Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Science [09-I-P23-07]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [07-04-00186, 08-04-91200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic divergence estimates using p-distances and similar measures were generated for 20,731 vertebrate and invertebrate animal species. The results of this analysis demonstrate that the data series are realistic and interpretable when the p-distance and its various derivates are used. The focus is on vertebrates and fish species in particular and the newest data set. Distance data reveal increasing levels of genetic divergence of the sequences of the two genes, cytochrome b (Cyt-b) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (Co-1), in the five groups compared: populations within species; subspecies, semi-species, or/and sibling species; species within a genus; species from different genera within a family; and species from separate families within an order. Mean unweighted scores of p-distances (%) for these five groups are Cyt-b-1.38 +/- 0.30, 5.10 +/- 0.91, 10.31 +/- 0.93, 17.86 +/- 1.36, and 26.36 +/- 3.88, respectively; and Co-1-0.89 +/- 0.16, 3.78 +/- 1.18, 11.06 +/- 0.53, 16.60 +/- 0.69, and 20.57 +/- 0.40, respectively. The estimates show good correspondence with other analyses. These results testify to the applicability of p-distance for most intra-species and inter-species comparisons of genetic divergence up to the order level in animals for the two genes compared. Data reviewed provide empirical and theoretical background on the geographic speciation mode prevalence in species origin and give a framework why per-individual species identification (DNA barcoding) is usually successful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available