4.7 Article

Examination of NaCl and MIBC as bubble coalescence inhibitor in relation to froth flotation

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 47-53

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.10.008

Keywords

Flotation; Bubble coalescence; Froth stability; Froth flotation; Flotation reagents; Flotation bubbles

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With scarcity of fresh water resources, flotation plants are increasingly under pressure to supply their water needs from other sources such as bore water, seawater or recycled plant water. This water generally contains a high concentration of inorganic electrolytes which may have a substantial influence on the performance of the flotation operation. In this study, the stabilisation mechanism of bubbles by salt was investigated using a specifically designed experimental set-up. Two bubbles of approximately the same size were produced at the tip of two adjacent capillaries in concentrated solutions of an inorganic electrolyte (NaCl). Their coalescence behaviour was recorded using high speed video imaging in which information such as coalescence time and deformation of the resultant bubble upon coalescence could be extracted. The results were then compared against a similar system using MIBC. It was found that delayed coalescence in NaCl required a relatively concentrated solution in the order of 0.1-0.5 M to achieve coalescence times comparable to MIBC. Unlike NaCl, it appears that a small amount of MIBC, in the order of 10(-5) M. is sufficient to delay the coalescence of bubbles, which reach a maximum at a concentration of 3 x 10(-3) M. The analysis of oscillation patterns during the coalescence process revealed that the oscillation is noticeably damped in the presence of MIBC at high concentrations, although this is not the case in NaCl solutions. Results are discussed in terms of bubble stability, froth stability and their possible implications on particle recovery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available