4.3 Article

The concept of 'end of waste' and recycling of hazardous materials: in depth characterization of the product of thermal transformation of cement-asbestos

Journal

MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages 1177-1191

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2014.078.5.06

Keywords

end of waste; secondary raw material; cement-asbestos; thermal transformation

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian grant: PROGRAMMI DI RICERCA SCIENTIFICA DI RILEVANTE INTERESSE NAZIONALE) [D.M. 1152/ric, 2010MKHT9B_004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selected samples of asbestos-containing material (ACM) with different Ca/Si ratios have been treated thermally at 1200 degrees C for 15 min to obtain an `'end of waste geo-inspired material'. Before and after treatment, micro-Raman spectroscopy allowed the investigation of both powdered and massive samples by directing the laser beam onto crystals with elongated morphology, thin fibres and the matrix. In the raw samples, chrysotile and/or crocidolite were detected. After the thermal treatment, no asbestos phases were identified in the Raman spectra collected on fibrous or fibre-like morphologies. The scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopy investigations confirmed the onset of a pseudomorphic process during annealing, leading to the complete transformation of asbestos minerals into non-hazardous magnesium or calcium magnesium silicates such as forsterite, monticellite, akermanite and merwinite. The identification of such mineral assemblages was inspired by the close inspection of a natural counterpart, the high-temperature contact metamorphic imprint due to the intrusion of a sill into carbonate rocks. The process turned out to occur largely at the solid state and involved substantial mobilization of Ca and Mg to form a spinel phase (namely MgFe2O4) which was recognized in the matrix and within, or close to elongated morphologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available