4.3 Article

The crystal structure of sarmientite, Fe23+(AsO4)(SO4)(OH)•5H2O, solved ab initio from laboratory powder diffraction data

Journal

MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 347-360

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2014.078.2.08

Keywords

arsenic; sulfate; Rietveld refinement; octahedral-tetrahedral chains; hydrogen bonding; ab initio structure solution

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT2012-35247, CSD2007-00041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structure of sarmientite, Fe-2(3+) (AsO4)(SO4)(OH)center dot 5H(2)O, from the type locality (Santa Elena mine, San Juan Province, Argentina), was solved and refined from in-house powder diffraction data (CuK alpha(1,2) radiation). It is monoclinic, space group P2(1)/n, with unit-cell dimensions a = 6.5298(1), b = 18.5228(4), c = 9.6344(3) angstrom, beta = 97.444(2)degrees, V = 1155.5(5) angstrom(3), and Z = 4. The structure model was derived from cluster-based Patterson-function direct methods and refined by means of the Rietveld method to R-wp = 0.0733 (chi(2) = 2.20). The structure consists of pairs of octahedral-tetrahedral (Fe-As) chains at (y, z) = (0,0) and (1/2, 1/2), running along a. There are two symmetry-independent octahedral Fe sites. The Fe1 octahedra share two corners with the neighbouring arsenate groups. Both individual chains are related by a symmetry centre and joined by two symmetry-related Fe2 octahedra. Each Fe2 octahedron shares three corners with double-chain polyhedra (O3, O4 with arsenate groups; the O8 hydroxyl group with the Fe1 octahedron) and one corner (O11) with the monodentate sulfate group. The coordination of the Fe2 octahedron is completed by two H2O molecules (O9 and O10). There is also a complex network of H bonds that connects polyhedra within and among chains. Raman and infrared spectra show that (SO4)(2-) tetrahedra are strongly distorted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available