4.4 Article

Why National eHealth Programs Need Dead Philosophers: Wittgensteinian Reflections on Policymakers' Reluctance to Learn from History

Journal

MILBANK QUARTERLY
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 533-563

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00642.x

Keywords

eHealth; policymaking; case study; ethnography; evaluation; Wittgenstein; sensemaking; learning community

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0600654] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0600654] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Policymakers seeking to introduce expensive national eHealth programs would be advised to study lessons from elsewhere. But these lessons are unclear, partly because a paradigm war (controlled experiment versus interpretive case study) is raging. England's $20.6 billion National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT) ran from 2003 to 2010, but its overall success was limited. Although case study evaluations were published, policymakers appeared to overlook many of their recommendations and persisted with some of the NPfIT's most criticized components and implementation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available