4.4 Article

Randomised-controlled trial of two antenatal education programmes

Journal

MIDWIFERY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 114-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.012

Keywords

Childbirth education; Pregnancy; Randomised control trial; Programme evaluation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: to determine whether a new antenatal education programme with increased parenting content could improve parenting outcomes for women compared with a regular antenatal education programme. Design: a randomised-controlled trial. Data were collected through self-report surveys. Setting: specialist referral maternity hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants: 170 women birthing at the hospital. Ninety-one women attended the new programme and 79 the regular programme. Intervention: a new antenatal education programme ('Having a Baby' programme) developed from needs assessment data collected from expectant and new parents. One important feature of the programme was the recognition that pregnancy, tabour, birth and early parenting were a microcosm of the childbearing experience, rather than separate topics. Measures: the primary outcome measure was perceived maternal parenting self-efficacy. Worry about the baby, and perceived parenting knowledge, were secondary outcome measures. They were measured before the programme and after birth. Birth outcomes were also recorded. Findings: the postnatal perceived maternal parenting self-efficacy scores of women who attended the 'Having a Baby' programme were significantly higher than those who attended the regular programme. Perceived parenting knowledge scores of women who attended the 'Having a Baby' programme were also significantly higher than those who attended the regular programme. Worry scores were lower but they did not reach statistical significant. Birth outcomes were similar. Implications for practice: the 'Having a Baby' programme improved maternal self-efficacy and parenting knowledge. Parenting programmes that continue in the early postnatal period may be beneficial. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available