4.7 Article

Effects of heat killed Lactobacillus plantarum (LP20) supplemental diets on growth performance, stress resistance and immune response of red sea bream, Pagrus major

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 442, Issue -, Pages 29-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.005

Keywords

Heat killed bacteria; Lactobacillus plantarum; Red sea bream; Growth performance; Blood parameters; Immune response

Funding

  1. Egyptian government
  2. Management Expenses Grants of the United Graduate School of Agriculture Sciences, Kagoshima University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A feeding trial was carried out to determine effects of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum (HK-LP) for red sea bream (Pagrus major). Five dietary levels of a commercial product containing 20% HK-LP at 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 2000 mg kg(-1) diets were supplemented to the basal diet (control), respectively. Triplicate groups of fish (initial weight: 11 g) were stocked in 100-L polycarbonate circular tanks at a density of 12 fish per tank under the flow-through system, and were fed the respective test diets for 56 days. At the end of a feeding trial, the results showed that the fish fed the diet at 10, 100, 1000 and 2000 mg kg(-1) HK-LP significantly grew faster than control group. Similarly, significantly improved feed intake, feed efficiency ratio, protein retention, and apparent digestibility coefficients were also found at 1000 mg kg(-1) HK-LP group than those in HK-LP free group. Someparameters such as serumlysozyme activity, total serumprotein, mucus secretion, and the tolerance against low salinity stress were improved in fish fed 1000 mg kg(-1) HK-LP compared to those in HK-LP free group. This study demonstrated that HK-LP enhanced non-specific immune defense system of red sea bream, providing them with higher resistance to the stress and better immune response. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available