4.4 Article

Identification of class III β-tubulin as a marker of angiogenic perivascular cells

Journal

MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 257-262

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.09.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Board of Regents of the State of Louisiana [LEQSF(2009-12)-RD-A-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A full understanding of the functional role for pericytes in microvascular network growth requires identifying the specific cell phenotypes involved in angiogenesis. The objective of this study was to evaluate class III beta-tubulin expression along remodeling adult rat mesenteric microvascular networks. Mesenteric tissues were harvested from unstimulated adult male Wistar rats and at 2, 10 and 30 days post-compound 48/80 stimulation (n = 4 per experimental group). Tissues were immunohistochemically labeled with antibodies for class III beta-tubilin NG2 and PECAM. In unstimulated microvascular networks, class III beta-tubulin was nerve specific, and did not identify vascular cells along PECAM positive arterioles, venules, and capillaries. Two days post 48/80 stimuli, class III beta-tubulin labeling of perivascular cells, including pericytes and smooth muscle cells, was observed along capillary sprouts, capillaries, venules, and arterioles in network regions characterized by increased vessel density and tortuosity. Pericyte identity along capillaries and capillary sprouts was confirmed by cell morphology and co-labeling with NG2. The percentage of vessels with class III beta-tubulin positive labeling decreased at subsequent time points and temporally correlated with the time course of capillary sprouting. The results identify class III beta-tubulin as a marker of angiogenic perivascular cells and suggest that specific pericyte phenotypes are associated with capillary sprouting. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available