4.3 Article

Can regenerated nerve fibers return to normal size? A long-term post-traumatic study of the rat median nerve crush injury model

Journal

MICROSURGERY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 383-387

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/micr.21969

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministero dell'Universita, dell'Istruzione e della Ricerca
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo
  3. Regione Piemonte

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whether post-traumatic regeneration can eventually result in rat peripheral nerve fibers regaining their pretrauma size is still an open question. While it has been shown that, after a sufficient duration in post-traumatic time, the number of regenerated rat peripheral nerve fibers can return to pretrauma numbers and the animal can regain normal prelesion function, no information regarding long-term changes in the size parameters of the regenerated nerve fibers is available. To fill this gap, we have investigated the post-traumatic changes in myelinated axon and nerve fiber diameter, myelin thickness, and g-ratio (the ratio of the inner axonal diameter to the fiber diameter) at three different time points following nerve injury: week-6, week-8, and week-24. A standardized nerve crush injury of the rat median nerve obtained using a nonserrated clamp was used for this study. The results showed that, consistent with previous studies, fiber number returned to normal values at week-24, but both axon and fiber diameter and myelin thickness were still significantly lower at week-24 than prelesion, and the g-ratio, which remained unchanged during the regeneration process, was significantly reduced at week-24 in comparison to the prelesion value. On the basis of these results, the hypothesis that regenerated rat peripheral nerve fibers are able to return spontaneously to their normal pretrauma state, provided there is a sufficiently long recovery time postaxonotmesis, is not supported. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available