4.4 Article

A population-based cohort study on deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among schizophrenia patients

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 162, Issue 1-3, Pages 248-252

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.012

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; National Health Insurance Research Database

Categories

Funding

  1. China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence, Health, and welfare surcharge of tobacco products [MOHW103-TDU-B-212-113002]
  2. China Medical University Hospital Cancer Research Center of Excellence (Taiwan) [MOHW104-TD-B-111-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Several risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were found in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, we hypothesize that the incidences of VTE and PE are relatively higher among schizophrenia patients in comparison with the general population. Method: For this population-based cohort study, claims data from 1996 to 2011 were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We compared the incidence of DVT and PE between schizophrenia and non-schizophrenia cohorts. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the risk of DVT and PE, according to sex, age, and comorbidities. Results: Compared with the non-schizophrenia cohort, the schizophrenia cohort exhibited a 2.02-fold higher adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for developing DVT, and a 1.99-fold higher adjusted HR for developing PE. Furthermore, schizophrenia patients using first-generation or second-generation antipsychotics exhibited a higher adjusted HR for both DVT and PE development. Conclusion: Compared with the general population, the risk of DVT and PE is relatively higher among schizophrenia patients. Early diagnosis and intervention by physicians could mitigate complications and reduce mortality resulting from VTE. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available