4.4 Article

Long-term clinical course and outcome of schizophrenia in rural Ethiopia: 10-year follow-up of a population-based cohort

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 161, Issue 2-3, Pages 414-420

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.053

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Course; Outcome; Gender; Follow-up study; Ethiopia

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute (SMRI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although the few available studies from LMICs report favorable outcome, the course of schizophrenia is more complex than has been indicated so far. Methods: A sample of 361 people with a standardized clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia were recruited from a predominantly rural community in Ethiopia and followed up regularly for an average of 10 years. Psychiatrists used the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation chart to carry out assessment of illness course. Duration of time in clinical remission was the primary outcome. Result: About 61.0% of the patients remained under active follow-up, while 18.1% (n = 65) were deceased. The mean percentage of follow-up time in complete remission was 28.4% (SD = 33.0). Female patients were significantly more likely to have episodic illness course with no inter-episode residual or negative symptoms (chi(2) = 6.28, P = 0.012). Nearly 14.0% had continuous psychotic symptoms for over 75% of their follow-up time. Only 18.1% achieved complete remission for over 75% of their follow-up time. Later onset of illness was the only significant predictor of achieving full remission for over 50% of follow-up time in a fully adjusted model. Conventional antipsychotic medications were fairly well tolerated in 80% of the patients and 4.2% (n = 15) experienced tardive dyskinesia. Conclusion: This population-based study is one of the very few long-term outcome studies of schizophrenia in LMICs. The study demonstrated clearly a differential and more favorable course and outcome for female patients but overall course and outcome of schizophrenia appeared less favorable in this setting than has been reported from other LMICs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available