4.5 Article

Malathion-Induced Granulosa Cell Apoptosis in Caprine Antral Follicles: An Ultrastructural and Flow Cytometric Analysis

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1861-1868

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927614013452

Keywords

apoptosis; malathion; oxidative stress; ultrastructure

Funding

  1. UGC, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organophosphate pesticides (OPs) like malathion interfere with normal ovarian function resulting in an increased incidence of atresia and granulosa cell apoptosis that plays a consequential role in the loss of ovarian follicles or follicular atresia. The aim of present study was to assess malathion-induced (100 nM) reproductive stress, ultrastructural damage and changes in apoptosis frequency in ovarian granulosa cells of antral follicles. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed for ultrastructural characterization, oxidative stress was evaluated using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay to measure lipid peroxidation, and apoptosis was quantified via flow cytometry. By TEM, apoptosis was identified by the presence of an indented nuclear membrane with blebbing, pyknotic crescent-shaped fragmented nuclei, increased vacuolization, degenerating mitochondria, and lipid droplets. The results indicate a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) level (nmols/g wet tissue) at a 100 nM dose of malathion i.e. 7.57 +/- 0.033*, 8.53 +/- 0.12*, and 12.87 +/- 0.78** at 4, 6, or 8 h, respectively, as compared with controls (6.07 +/- 0.033, p<0.01*, p<0.05**) showing a positive correlation between malathion-induced lipid peroxidation and percentage of granulosa cell apoptosis (r=1; p<0.01). The parallel use of these three methods enabled us to determine the role of malathion in inducing apoptosis as a consequence of cytogenetic damage and oxidative stress generated in granulosa cells of antral follicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available