4.5 Article

Microstructural Characterization of Concrete Prepared with Recycled Aggregates

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 1222-1230

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927613001463

Keywords

concrete; construction and demolition waste; recycled fine aggregates; porosity; ITZ; microscopy

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [PEst-OE/CTM/UI0084/2011]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/CTM/UI0084/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several authors have reported the workability, mechanical properties, and durability of concrete produced with construction waste replacing the natural aggregate. However, a systematic microstructural characterization of recycled aggregate concrete has not been reported. This work studies the use of fine recycled aggregate to replace fine natural aggregate in the production of concrete and reports the resulting microstructures. The used raw materials were natural aggregate, recycled aggregate obtained from a standard concrete, and Portland cement. The substitution extent was 0, 10, 50, and 100 vol%; hydration was stopped at 9, 24, and 96 h and 28 days. Microscopy was focused on the cement/aggregate interfacial transition zone, enlightening the effect of incorporating recycled aggregate on the formation and morphology of the different concrete hydration products. The results show that concretes with recycled aggregates exhibit typical microstructural features of the transition zone in normal strength concrete. Although overall porosity increases with increasing replacement, the interfacial bond is apparently stronger when recycled aggregates are used. An addition of 10 vol% results in a decrease in porosity at the interface with a corresponding increase of the material hardness. This provides an opportunity for development of increased strength Portland cement concretes using controlled amounts of concrete waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available