Journal
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 164, Issue 1-3, Pages 149-154Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.025
Keywords
Antipsychotics; Dopamine D-2 receptor; Maintenance treatment; Schizophrenia
Categories
Funding
- Takeda Science Foundation
- Kanae Science Foundation
- Keio Academic Development Funds
- Research Group for Schizophrenia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: Blockade of dopamine D-2 receptors with antipsychotics above 65% is associated with optimal chance of clinical response although recent data suggest a lower threshold for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to prospectively examine whether such continuous high blockade would be necessary for maintenance treatment. Method: In this single-blind, 52-week, randomized controlled trial, clinically stable patients with schizophrenia receiving risperidone or olanzapine were randomly assigned to the continuous D-2 blockade (i.e. an estimated trough D-2 blockade of N65%) or non-continuous blockade group (i.e. an estimated peak level of N65% with an estimated trough level of >65%). Oral doses corresponding to the assigned blockade levels were estimated from random plasma drug concentrations, using the models we developed; antipsychotic doses were then adjusted accordingly. Psychopathology and side effects were assessed at baseline and one year with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Results: Sixty-eight subjects (34 in each group) were enrolled. Twenty-six (76.5%) and thirty-one (91.2%) subjects completed the study in the continuous and non-continuous blockade groups, respectively, without any significant group difference. No significant differences were found on any of the assessment scales between the two groups. The degree of dosage change was small in both groups. Conclusion: These results offer support that the threshold for D-2 receptor lockade in the maintenance treatment can be lower than 65%. However, these preliminary findings have to be confirmed through double-blind, larger scale trials with longer follow-up periods. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available