4.5 Article

Three-Dimensional Optical Sectioning by Scanning Confocal Electron Microscopy with a Stage-Scanning System

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 233-238

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927610000127

Keywords

scanning confocal electron microscopy; three-dimensional imaging; optical sectioning; stage scanning; annular dark-field imaging; nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan [20760027]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20760027] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the depth resolution of annular dark-field (ADF) scanning confocal electron microscopy (SCEM) with a stage-scanning system by observation of nanoparticles. ADF-SCEM is a three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique that we recently proposed. An ADF-SCEM instrument involves a pinhole aperture before a detector for rejecting electrons from the out-of-focal plane in a specimen and an annular aperture under the specimen for collecting only scattered electrons. The stage-scanning system enables us to directly obtain optical slice images perpendicular and parallel to an optical axis at a desired position. In particular, the parallel slices visualize the elongation of nanoparticles along the optical axis, which depends on the depth resolution. ADF-SCEM effectively reduced the elongation length of the nanoparticles sufficiently to demonstrate depth sectioning, in comparison with scanning transmission electron microscopy and bright-field SCEM. The experimentally obtained length was nearly equal to the theoretically estimated one from the probe size considering the experimental conditions. Furthermore, we applied this ADF-SCEM technique to analysis of the 3D position of catalytic nanoparticles on carbon nanostructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available