4.5 Article

Toward Reproducible Three-Dimensional Microstructure Analysis of Granular Materials and Complex Suspensions

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 130-146

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927609090163

Keywords

focused ion beam (FIB); nanotomography; image analysis; particle size distribution; nanoparticles; agglomeration; ordinary portland cement; cryomicroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Focused ion beam nanotomography (FIB-nt) is a novel method for high resolution three-dimensional (3D) imaging. In this investigation we assess the methodological parameters related to image acquisition and data processing that are critical for obtaining reproducible microstructural results from granular materials and from Complex Suspensions. For this purpose three case studies are performed: (1) The precision of FIB-nt is evaluated by analyzing a reference sample with nanospheres. Due to the implementation of an automated correction procedure, drift phenomena can be removed largely from the FIB data. However, at high magnifications remaining drift components can induce problems for 3D-shape reconstructions. (2) Correct object recognition from densely packed microstructures requires specific algorithms for splitting of agglomerated particles. To establish quantitative criteria for the correct degree of splitting, a parametric study, with dry portland cement is performed. It is shown that splitting with a k-value of 0.6 leads to accurate results. (3) Finally, the reproducibility of the entire cryo-FIB analysis is investigated for high pressure frozen cement suspensions. Reproducible analyses can be obtained if the magnification is adapted to the particle size. At low magnifications the small particles and their Surface area are underestimated. At high magnifications representativity is questioned because local inhomogeneities can become dominant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available