4.7 Article

MOFomics: Computational pore characterization of metal-organic frameworks

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 32-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.07.049

Keywords

Metal-organic framework; Zeolitic imidazolate framework; Pore characterization; Accessible volume; Accessible surface area

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF EFRI-0937706]
  2. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1263165] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Emerging Frontiers & Multidisciplinary Activities
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0937706] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microporous materials, such as zeolites and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), are commonly considered for shape-selective separations and catalysis. With the large number of known and hypothetical structures available, computational techniques are needed to identify the most promising structures for applications of interest. We have developed an automated computational framework based on optimization, geometry, and graph algorithms to fully characterize the three-dimensional pore structures of MOFs. Our methods automatically identify the portals, channels, and cages of a MOF and describe their geometry and connectivity. Furthermore, we calculate quantities of interest including pore size distribution, accessible volume, accessible surface area, pore limiting diameter, and largest cavity diameter. Our computational framework has been applied to over 800 experimental MOFs, including zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), and over 1600 hypothetical MOFs. MOFomics, an online database of pore characterizations and the first web tool for MOFs that allows user submissions, is made freely available to the scientific communit (http://helios.princeton.edu/mofomics/). (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available