4.7 Article

Hydrotreating of gas oil on SBA-15 supported NiMo catalysts

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 111, Issue 1-3, Pages 560-568

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.037

Keywords

SBA-15; NiMo catalyst; DRIFT of adsorbed CO; hydrotreating; light gas oil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The siliceous and the metal substituted (B or Al)-SBA-15 molecular sieves were used as a support for NiMo hydrotreating catalysts (12 wt.% Mo and 2.4 wt.% Ni). The supports were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy and N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms. The SBA-15 supported NiMo catalysts in oxide state were characterized by BET surface area analysis and XRD. The sulfided NiMo/SBA-15 catalysts were examined by DRIFT of CO adsorption and TPD of NH3. The HDN and HDS activities with bitumen derived light gas oil at industrial conditions showed that Al substituted SBA-15 (Al-SBA- 15) is the best among the supports studied for NiMo catalyst. A series of NiMo catalysts containing 7-22 wt.% Mo with Ni/Mo weight ratio of 0.2 was prepared using Al-SBA-15 support and characterized by BET surface area analysis, XRD and temperature programmed reduction and DRIFT spectroscopy of adsorbed CO. The DRIFT spectra of adsorbed CO showed the presence of both unpromoted and Ni promoted MoS2 sites in all the catalysts, and maximum NiMoS sites concentration with 17 wt.% of Mo loading. The HDN and HDS activities of NiMo/Al-SBA-15 catalysts were studied using light gas oil at temperature, pressure and WHSV of 370 degrees C, 1300 psig and 4.5 h(-1), respectively. The NiMo/Al-SBA-15 catalyst with 17 wt.% Mo and 3.4 wt.% of Ni is found to be the best catalyst. The HDN and HDS activities of this catalyst are comparable with the conventional Al2O3 supported NiMo catalyst in real feed at industrial conditions. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available