4.4 Article

Effect of polyethylene glycol on vanadium oxide nanotubes in lithium-ion batteries

Journal

MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 81-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2014.04.044

Keywords

V2O5 nanotubes; PEG; Lithium-ion battery; Cyclic voltammogram; Morphology

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939704]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51072152, 51072145, 51161140399]
  3. Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China [C2010007]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2010CDA015]
  5. Wuhan Scientific and Technological Project [201051730550]
  6. Science-Technology Chenguang Foundation for Young Scientist of Wuhan [201150431087]
  7. Wuhan University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vanadium oxide (V2O5) nanotubes and polyethylene glycol (PEG) surfactant V2O5 nanotubes were synthesized using simple hydrothermal process. The electrochemical performance of these nanostructures was investigated for the application of Li batteries. Microstructure and morphology of the samples were studied by XRD, FTIR, FE-SEM and TEM analysis. The results showed that the H atoms of PEG are hydrogen bonded with the O atoms in V=O bonds of the V2O5, which effectively shielded against electrostatic interaction between the V2O5 interlayer and Li+ ions. The battery of V2O5 nanotubes electrode showed initial specific capacity 192 mAhg(-1), whereas the PEG surfactant V2O5 nanotubes exhibited 204 mAhg(-1). It was found that PEG surfactant V2O5 nanotubes material showed high specific capacity at initial stages besides better stability was exhibited at higher cycle numbers when compared to V2O5 nanotubes. The cyclic performance of the PEG surfactant material seems to be improved with the role of polymeric component due to its surface reaction with V2O5 nanotubes during the hydrothermal synthesis. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available