4.4 Article

Analysis of the effective reflectance of digital micromirror devices and process parameters for maskless photolithography

Journal

MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages 235-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2010.10.039

Keywords

Maskless photolithography; Digital micromirror device (DMD); Effective reflectance; Diffraction efficiency; Spot overlap; Spot blur

Funding

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea [10031688]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10031688] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of the effective reflectance of digital micromirror devices (DMD) is used to predict exposure doses in optical maskless photolithography applications. The effective reflectance is determined by multiplying the diffraction efficiency by the reflectance of the DMD in a dynamic mode. The diffraction efficiency is calculated using multiple slit diffraction theory and the two-dimensional grating equation for the wavelengths of the lithography sources, C-line (436 nm), H-line (405 nm), and I-line (365 nm). The diffraction efficiency is also used to determine the optimized dimensions of a DMD's pitch size. The reflectance of the DMD in a dynamic mode linearly decreases as the frame rate increases, dropping by similar to 8% at a frame rate of 16,000 frames per second. The process parameters are analyzed in the terms of spot overlap and blur, which can have an effect on pattern quality. The spot overlap tends to increase with the frame rate of DMD, and it decreases with the stage speed. The spot blur, analyzed as a function of the illumination time and stage speed, also shows proportional behavior with those parameters. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available