4.1 Article

Retinal Pulse Wave Velocity in Young Male Normotensive and Mildly Hypertensive Subjects

Journal

MICROCIRCULATION
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 405-415

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/micc.12036

Keywords

retinal vessels; microvascular arterial stiffness; pre-hypertension; hypertension; early marker

Funding

  1. Else-Kroner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Germany [P27/10//A33/10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Hypertension is characterized by microvascular remodeling resulting in increased wall/lumen ratio and elevated microvascular stiffness. Aiming to transform the measurement of macrovascular stiffness into a microvascular environment we introduce a noninvasive method to assess rPWV. rPWV alterations in early hypertension are investigated in detail. The developed methodology is compared with its possible computational alternatives. Methods Time dependent alterations of retinal arterial diameter were assessed noninvasively by the DVA in 65 male normoalbuminuric normotensive to mildly hypertensive subjects (age: 28.7 +/- 6.0years). rPWV was computed using three different methods. Method 1 used filtration at HR, Method 2 filtered at higher HR multiples, and Method 3 used in addition, linear fit for data averaging. Results Method 2 and Method 3 applying filtration at high HR multiples showed strong associations with systolic BP throughout the cohort (r=0.49, r=0.63, p<0.001). Based on the highest association, Method 3 was proposed to characterize rPWV. Hypertensive patients showed higher rPWV (1243 +/- 694RU/sec) than subjects with high-normal BP (786 +/- 486RU/sec, p<0.01) or normotensive subjects (442 +/- 148RU/sec, p<0.001). Conclusions rPWV demonstrated a strong association with BP and can discriminate between optimal, high-normal, and mildly hypertensive BP values. rPWV may add detailed insights into early microvascular pathophysiology, potentially beyond microalbuminuria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available