4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive determination of mercury in human saliva by atomic fluorescence spectrometry based on solidified floating organic drop microextraction

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 177, Issue 1-2, Pages 153-158

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-012-0768-7

Keywords

Solidified floating organic drop microextraction; Mercury; Atomic fluorescence spectrometry; Saliva

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0341]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2010001676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on a new, rapid and simple method for the determination of ultra-trace quantities of mercury ion in human saliva. It is based on solidified floating organic drop microextraction and detection by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CV-AFS). Mercury ion was complexed with diethyldithiocarbamate, and the hydrophobic complex was then extracted into fine droplets of 1-undecanol. By cooling in an ice bath after extraction, the droplets in solution solidify to form a single ball floating on the surface of solution. The solidified microdrop containing the mercury complex was then transferred for determination by CV-AFS. The effects of pH value, concentration of chelating reagent, quantity of 1-undecanol, sample volume, equilibration temperature and time were investigated. Under the optimum conditions, the preconcentration of a 25-mL sample is accomplished with an enrichment factor of 182. The limit of detection (3 sigma) is 2.5 ng L-1. The relative standard deviation for seven replicate determinations at 0.1 ng mL(-1) level is 4.1%. The method was applied to the determination of mercury in saliva samples collected from four volunteers. Two volunteers having dental amalgam fillings had 0.4 ng mL(-1) mercury in their saliva, whereas mercury was not detectable in the saliva of two volunteers who had no dental fillings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available