4.0 Article

The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Journal

SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages 252-263

Publisher

ASSOCIACAO PAULISTA MEDICINA
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00351712

Keywords

Depressive disorder; major; Electric stimulation therapy; Citalopram; Randomized controlled trial; Biological markers

Funding

  1. FAPESP Young Researcher grant from the Sao Paulo State Foundation (FAPESP) [20911-5]
  2. NARSAD Young Investigator grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [20493]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development grant (CNPq) [470904]
  4. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [20493]
  5. Scientific Initiation fellowships from FAPESP [2013/19759-7, 2013/19566-4]
  6. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, mostly treated with antidepressant drugs, which are limited due to refractoriness and adverse effects. We describe the study rationale and design of ELECT-TDCS (Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study), which is investigating a non-pharmacological treatment known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). DESIGN AND SETTING: Phase-III, randomized, non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled study, ongoing in Sao Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: ELECT-TDCS compares the efficacy of active tDCS/placebo pill, sham tDCS/escitalopram 20 mg/day and sham tDCS/placebo pill, for ten weeks, randomizing 240 patients in a 3: 3: 2 ratio, respectively. Our primary aim is to show that tDCS is not inferior to escitalopram with a non-inferiority margin of at least 50% of the escitalopram effect, in relation to placebo. As secondary aims, we investigate several biomarkers such as genetic polymorphisms, neurotrophin serum markers, motor cortical excitability, heart rate variability and neuroimaging. RESULTS: Proving that tDCS is similarly effective to antidepressants would have a tremendous impact on clinical psychiatry, since tDCS is virtually devoid of adverse effects. Its ease of use, portability and low price are further compelling characteristics for its use in primary and secondary healthcare. Multimodal investigation of biomarkers will also contribute towards understanding the antidepressant mechanisms of action of tDCS. CONCLUSION: Our results have the potential to introduce a novel technique to the therapeutic arsenal of treatments for depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available