4.7 Article

Sequential multi-element determination of iron and zinc in water samples by high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after column solid-phase extraction onto multiwalled carbon nanotubes

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 138-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2014.06.023

Keywords

High-resolution continuum source GFAAS; Iron; Zinc; Multiwalled carbon nanotubes; Solid-phase extraction

Funding

  1. National Science Centre (NCN), Poland [UMO-2012/06/A/ST4/00382]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method for the sequential multi-element determination of iron and zinc in water samples by high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (HR-CS GFAAS) after column solid-phase extraction onto multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was described. The influences of some analytical parameters (including pH of the sample solution, amount of MWCNTs, flow rate of sample, concentration and type of eluent, maximum sample volume and coexisting ions) were investigated for optimization of the proposed procedure. The concentration limits of detection were 4 and 0.5 ng L-1 for Fe and Zn, respectively; the preconcentration factors achieved for Fe and Zn were 25 and 20, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 6% and 4% for Fe and Zn, respectively. The accuracy of this method was validated by analyses of NIST SRM 1643e (Trace Elements in Water) and ERM - CA011b (Hard Drinking Water) certified reference materials. The measured element contents in these reference materials were in satisfactory agreement with the certified values according to the t-test for a 95% confidence level. The presented method has been successfully applied for the determination of iron and zinc in four different water samples (seawater, lake water, mine water and tap water). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available