4.7 Article

Optimum supply air temperature ranges of various air-side economizers in a modular data center

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 163-179

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.021

Keywords

Modular data center; Air-side economizer; Optimum supply air temperature ranges; Energy simulation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean governmen [2012001927]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology - Korean Government [10045236]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10045236] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to reduce data center cooling energy, ASHRAE Technical Committee 9.9 expanded thermal environmental ranges for data centers and recommended using the economizer, and it has reduced data center cooling energy successfully. The main purpose of this research is to establish an energy optimization process for the air-side economizer in a modular data center with respect to various parameters (supply air conditions, server thermal characteristics, cooling system configurations, and heat exchange effectiveness), and to determine optimum supply air ranges through simulation. The cooling energy simulation is conducted for three types of air-side economizers by changing the supply air temperature (SAT) and heat exchanger effectiveness at 16 locations in South Korea based on the three thermal environmental ranges. The simulation result shows that the lowest cooling energy consumption appears when the computer room air handler (CRAH) SAT is within 18-23 degrees C, and at higher SAT conditions, the cooling energy consumption increases, since chiller energy reduction is offset by the increase in CRAH fan energy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available